By CHRIS POWELL
For many years Connecticut’s teacher unions ran a discreet political racket. Many of their members would hold teaching jobs in towns adjacent to the towns in which they lived and then seek municipal office in their home towns, particularly office on their local board of education. They were usually elected.
Republican senators top governor’s tax cut by $1 billion
More environmental deceit; and hypocrisy on housing
Lamont thrills Democrats with nullification rhetoric
This arrangement — working in one town, getting elected in another — would mask a potential conflict of interest, wherein, as municipal officials, these board members would decide on or even negotiate contracts with a local affiliate of the statewide union to which they also belonged via their job in a neighboring town. Were board members most loyal to the public interest or to their union interest?
Since the connection of school board members to the union whose members get most money spent by school boards was seldom reported by news organizations, the question of primary loyalty was not posed in public forums. If it had been posed, it might have elicited a claim that the public interest and the union interest were identical. That might have been an interesting discussion.
The teacher union racket is no longer discreet. For the Yankee Institute’s Meghan Portfolio reported the other day that the state’s largest teacher union, the Connecticut Education Association, now celebrates the racket. The union’s December newsletter proclaims that in November’s municipal elections 57 CEA members won elections in more than 45 towns, with only five of the union’s candidates losing.
The CEA newsletter, Portfolio writes, “makes clear this was no spontaneous wave of civic participation. Candidates were guided through a union-run pipeline, including a formal questionnaire process and participation in the National Education Association’s ‘See Educators Run’ program.”
The union threw its resources into its members’ campaigns with e-mails, text messages, flyers, telephone calls, and door-to-door canvassing. Since name recognition and personal contact are the main deciders of most municipal elections, such electioneering is usually successful, especially since news coverage of school board elections, always skimpy, has vanished.
Indeed, the CEA may already have figured out that with just a little more effort it can gain control of every school board and town council in the state before people realize what is going on, there being no one left to tell them.
Of course this is only democratic politics in the era of local journalism’s demise. Even people with the worst potential conflicts of interest have the right to run for public office, and special interests with access to big money, especially money derived from government, heavily influence if not control all sorts of political nominations and elections everywhere, though this is most pronounced with teacher union control of the Democratic Party. Teacher union members typically constitute 10% of the party’s national convention delegates.
But the special interest influence in politics and government may be worst with teacher unions, since education is the prerequisite of democracy. Destroy education and you destroy democracy, and the trends in American education are terrible. Enrollments, student proficiency, and accountability are falling even as school costs keep rising, and civic engagement is collapsing along with journalism and literacy generally.
This is the perfect environment for special-interest control of government. No wonder the CEA, special interest No. 1, is celebrating.
College student loan debt remains a huge problem, so people may have welcomed the announcement last week that Connecticut’s Student Loan Reimbursement Program has begun accepting applications for reimbursement of college student loan payments made in 2025.
Reimbursement of up to $5,000 per year is available to Connecticut residents who earned a degree in the state and are making $125,000 a year or less.
This isn’t fair. It’s really a bailout for the failure of higher education, which is grossly overpriced, long having awarded degrees of little use in making a living and having stuck its victims with debt that seriously impairs their lives or that, as with Connecticut’s reimbursement program, is transferred to taxpayers, many of whom did not attend college or paid their own way.
It’s another part of the education racket.
Chris Powell has written about Connecticut government and politics for many years. (CPowell@cox.net)
Chris Powell column 